Shapie, M. N. M (1,2) & Mutalib, M. S (1)
1.Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Rekreasi, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor.
Abstract
The purpose of
this study is to describe accuracy among Indonesian Silat athlete during Sea
Games 2015. As to refer the study, a video recording during the match was use
for the analysis. The skills involve in this study has 3 outcome which is hit
target, hit elsewhere, and miss opponent. In dependent sample t-test used to analyse
the data between winner and loser.
INTRODUCTION
Silat is self-defences martial art
that from Malaysia, Indonesian, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Brunei.
Silat can be learning from early young ages for they can use it as protection. Silat
is a combative art of Malay fighting arts. Silat can be divided by two
categories which is silat olahraga and silat seni.
Motion analysis for silat is punch,
kick, block, topple, sweep, catch and dodge. Previous study shows that the
activity profile during action time. According to Shapie, Oliver, O'Donoghue, and Tong (2009),
the nature of work periods within any combat sports depends on the frequency,
volume and type of the activity being performed. The objective of this study is
to describe the skills involved between the winner and loser as well as to
determine the factor that influences the winner to win.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A
video recording of Indonesian Class A and Class D Indonesia team matched during
Sea Games in Singapore 2015 used for the analysis. There 2 silat athletes from
different country. The matches have 3 rounds which is 2 minute per round and 1
minute for rest interval. The notation involved various skill indicators which
is punch, block, topple, kick and sweep. Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences (SPSS) is used to calculate the statistical analysis and result. The
frequency was taken as data to be analysed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULT
1. Men’s
Class A Indonesia Versus Singapore (IND win)
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
18.0000
|
15.39480
|
8.88819
|
Singapore
|
3
|
20.3333
|
4.93288
|
2.84800
|
Table 1
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
35
|
5
|
14
|
54
|
SINGAPORE
|
26
|
17
|
18
|
61
|
2. Men’s
Class A Indonesia Versus Philippines (IND win)
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
15.0000
|
14.79865
|
8.54400
|
Philippines
|
3
|
16.3333
|
4.93288
|
2.84800
|
Table 2
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
32
|
8
|
5
|
45
|
PHILIPPINES
|
13
|
22
|
14
|
49
|
3. Men’s
Class A Indonesia Versus Vietnam (IND lose)
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
25.3333
|
15.69501
|
9.06152
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
22.6667
|
11.15049
|
6.43774
|
Table 3
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
13
|
20
|
43
|
76
|
VIETNAM
|
10
|
27
|
31
|
68
|
4. Men’s
Class D Indonesia Versus Thailand (IND lose)
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
score
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
32.6667
|
7.23418
|
4.17665
|
Thailand
|
3
|
35.6667
|
23.54428
|
13.59330
|
Table 4
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
41
|
28
|
29
|
98
|
THAILAND
|
60
|
34
|
13
|
107
|
DISCUSSION
As the result, we can see from table
3 and table 4 which is Indonesia versus Veitnam men’s Class A final (table 3)
and Indonesia versus Thailand men’s Class D lost the match. What we can see on
the table 3 and table 4 which the opponent has more hit target compare to the
both class Indonesia team. So win point give to the team which has more
accuracy. While table 1 and table 2 which is Indonesia versus Singapore (table
1) and Indonesia versus Philippine (table 2) men’s Class A for both match, win
the match. We can see Indonesia has more target than their opponents. Which
give them advantage to get more point and win game.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, every match shows a
good performance during match. Accuracy play important role in Silat olahraga.
Hit the target will get more point. While the miss opponent will give advantage
to the opponent team and will give them point to win. What we can see from the
video recording men’s Class A, the athlete tries more kick than use sweep. That
action also gives advantage to the opponent which the opponent will try to
sweep.
RECOMMENDATION
By watched the video recording,
especially final match men’s Class A, what we can see is sometime every plan
need to have another backup plan. Because game plan is a key to success,
sometime it can be intercepted by the opponent. Try not to rigid by following
the game plan. Sometime we need to act spontaneous so the opponent cannot
predict our next move and plan which make the athlete unpredictable.
REFERENCES
1. Abidin,
N. Z., & Adam, M. B. (2013). Prediction of vertical jump height from
anthropometric factors in male and female martial arts athletes. The Malaysian
journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 20(1), 39.
2. Aziz,
A. R., Tan, B., & Teh, K. C. (2002). Physiological responses during matches
and profile of elite pencak silat exponents. Journal of Sports Science and
Medicine, 1, 147-155.
3. Bird,
S. P., Barrington-Higgs, B., & Hendarsin, F. (2010). Relationship between
functional movement screening and physical fitness characteristics in
indonesian youth combat sport athletes. Paper presented at the 4th Exercise and
Sports Science Australia Conference.
4. Davidson,
A., & Trewartha, G. (2008). Understanding the physiological demands of
netball: A time-motion investigation. International Journal of Performance
Analysis in Sport, 8(3), 1-17.
5.
Jähnichen, G. (2016).
Silat: Observations from stong (kelantan) and from kuala penyu (sabah).
6. King,
S., & O'Donoghue, P. (2003). The activity profile of men's gaelic football.
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 3(2), 130-144.
7. O'Donoghue,
P., Rudkin, S., Bloomfield, J., Powell, S., Cairns, G., Dunkerley, A., et al.
(2005). Repeated work activity in english fa premier league soccer.
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(2), 46-57.
8.
Parnabas,
V., Shapie, M. N. M., & Parnabas, J. (2015). Level of drugs usage and sport
performance in malay silat. Ido Movement
for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 15(2), 45-51.
9. Pencak
Silat Tanding Men's Class A Final INA vs VIE (Day 9) - 28th SEA Games Singapore
2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TogWi7jsKcU&t=25s
10.
Pencak
Silat Men's Tanding Class A Semi-Final PHI vs INA (Day 8) | 28th SEA Games
Singapore 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5JphsM7YiU
11.
Pencak
Silat Tanding Category Indonesia vs Singapore (Day 6) | 28th SEA Games
Singapore 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdKHSsMioug
12.
Pencak
Silat Tanding Men's Class D Semi-Final THAI vs INA(Day 8) | 28th SEA Games
Singapore 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38l1L7K_Bf0&t=83s
13.
Shapie, M. N. M., Oliver, J., O'Donoghue,
P., & Tong, R. (2009). Activity
during action time in international silat competition. Paper presented at
the 3rd International Workshop of the International Society of Performance
Analysis of Sport.
15. Stark,
S. (2008). Pencak silat pertempuran: Stepping from stone to stone: Sean Stark.
16. Widiastuti,
W. (2014). Using game approach in improving learning outcomes of pencak silat. Asian Social Science, 10(5), 168.
No comments:
Post a Comment